CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Tuesday,
July 11, 2000, 2:20 p.m.
Aaronson
Auditorium
Tulsa
Central Library
400
Civic Center
MEMBERS
PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT OTHERS
PRESENT
|
Dunham,
Vice Chair |
|
Beach |
Prather, Legal |
|
Cooper Turnbo |
|
Butler Stump |
|
|
White,
Chair |
|
|
|
|
Perkins |
|
|
|
The notice and agenda of said meeting was posted in the Office of the City Clerk on Monday, July 10, 2000, at 2:16 p.m., as well as in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices.
After declaring a quorum present, Chair, White called the meeting to order at 2:22 p.m.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
MINUTES:
On
MOTION of Turnbo, the Board
voted to APPROVE the Minutes
of June 13, 2000 (No. 797).
Case No. 18796
Action
Requested:
Mr. Beach stated that the applicant withdrew
the request.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
This case was continued to allow time for the applicant to submit
a complete site plan with required parking information so a new notice could be
given for the proper relief. The applicant has been advised of what is needed
but has not provided it yet. The case is not ready for hearing. The Board can
continue the item to the meeting of August 2, 2000 or deny the request without
prejudice so the applicant can reapply when hes ready. The applicant was not present.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Turnbo, the Board voted 3-0-0 (White, Turnbo, Cooper aye; no nays; no abstentions; Dunham, Perkins absent) to DENY without prejudice, finding this case was not properly advertised and the applicant was not present.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Ms.
Perkins arrived at 2:28.
Action
Requested:
Variance, pursuant to the provisions of Table 2 of Section 903 of the Zoning Code, of the setback from center line of abutting street (North Yale Avenue) from 100 to 51. SECTION 903. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS; a Variance, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1303(D) of the Zoning Code, from the all weather material requirement for off-street parking to a gravel surface for the 15 driveway shown on the site plans. SECTION 1303. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS; and a Variance, pursuant to the provisions of Table 2 of Section 903 of the Zoning Code, of the setback from the abutting RS-3 zoning district boundary from 75 to 6. SECTION 903. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, located at 2315 N. Yale Ave.
Mr. Dunham arrived at
2:32.
Presentation:
Bill
LaFortune, 2900 Mid-Continent Tower, stated he represented clients who own 3
contiguous lots east 390 deep from Yale.
They received citation for zoning violations of 15 gravel drive, and a
recreational vehicle used as an office. Mr. LaFortune stated that the
applicant and Mr. Ballentine with Code Enforcement were in agreement with a
request for a 51 setback Variance from the centerline of Yale to allow the
existing trailer office to remain in the present location, and an 18 month limit
for a gravel driveway. The
applicant stated in a letter that he intends to build an office building and
pave the parking lot within the next 18 months. Mr. LaFortune submitted photographs
(Exhibit B-1).
Protestants:
Lloyd
Johnson,
2410 N. Canton, stated the subject property has not been properly cared for and
is not zoned correctly.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham explained that the Board could
only consider the action requested.
Interested
Parties:
Roscoe Turner, City Councilman, stated that he would be in agreement for an 18- month time limit to meet zoning requirements.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham,
the Board voted 4-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE
a Variance,
pursuant to the provisions of Table 2 of Section 903 of the Zoning Code, of the
setback from center line of abutting street (North Yale Avenue) from 100 to
51; a Variance, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1303(D) of
the Zoning Code, from the all weather material requirement for off-street
parking to a gravel surface for the 15 driveway shown on the site plans; and a
Variance pursuant to the provisions of Table 2 of Section 903 of
the Zoning Code, of the setback from the abutting RS-3 zoning district boundary
from 75 to 6, with the time limitation of 18 months from today, finding it
will not cause substantial detriment to the public good or impair the purposes,
spirit, and intent of the Code, or the Comprehensive Plan, on the following
described property:
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lot 5, Block 2, S R Lewis Addition to the City
of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Modification of
screening requirement. SECTION
212.C. SCREENING WALL OR FENCE, Modification of the Screening Wall or Fence
Requirement Use Unit 11, 23, 25, & 26; a Variance of requirement for
all-weather surfacing of off-street parking areas. SECTION 1303.D. DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OFF-STREET PARKING
AREAS; a Variance of building setback from 100 to 80 within an OL
district. SECTION 603. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE OFFICE
DISTRICTS; a Special Exception to permit Use Unit 26. SECTION 901. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICTS; and a Variance of use conditions requiring enclosure of uses included
within Use Unit 25 and 26 if located within 300 of an R district. SECTION 1225.C. USE UNIT 25. LIGHT MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRY, Use
Conditions and SECTION 1226.C. USE UNIT 26. MODERATE MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRY, Use
Conditions, located 13521 E. 11th St.
Presentation:
Roy
Johnsen, 201 W. 5th, Suite 501, gave a brief history of this case
and submitted an aerial photo and a list of the actions requested (Exhibit C-1)
which he used to present the case.
He covered each action requested and included suggested conditions by
which his client could comply with the zoning requirements, should the Board
approve the relief.
Protestants:
James
Mautino,
14628 E. 12th St., submitted an indexed packet of photographs,
petition with signatures, and related materials. He gave a brief history of the property
as a temporary batch plant. He
listed complaints of water retention ponds built in an R district, concrete mix
residue run-off into the creek, concrete mix dust pollution, truck trailer with
refrigerator diesel motor running continually, and open storage. He stated that East Tulsa Mingo Valley
Association requests that the Board deny this application.
Bob
Johnson,
15324 E. 13th St., stated he was one of the directors in the Tower
Heights Neighborhood Association.
He read a letter from Nancy Craten, as she was unable to attend. She indicated that the residents have
worked toward resolution to no avail; the concrete company has lessened their
quality of life; and that the land use conflicts with the zoning codes. She asked that the company be encouraged
to downsize their operation or relocate the business.
Hilda
Brown,
706 S. 138th E. Ave., stated she has owned her home there since
1953. She indicated that the
concrete plant has decreased the value of the residential property, ruined a
neighbors well water, and other issues as named previously.
Renee
Steele,
622 S. 132nd E. Ave., stated that the trees and foliage on the north
boundary are not enough to justify no screening. She stated her main concern is
stormwater drainage. She pointed
out that the City enlarged the 11th Street Bridge last summer, and
did not enlarge the culvert downstream and consequently they have had two floods
that got in their house since then.
She is now concerned about any new pavement at the plant causing more
drainage problems.
Comments and
Questions:
Ms.
Perkins asked if Ms. Steele has had her soil tested for any concentration of
calcium chloride or any residual from the batch plant. Ms. Steele stated they have not had the
soil tested, but from looking at the creek, there is definitely some sort of
residue in the water.
Applicants
Rebuttal:
Mr. Johnsen
assured the Board that Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) is aware of the
drainage flow, and even suggested the second pond. He stated that his client must follow
DEQ requirements and will comply.
He added that he saw no evidence of the complaint regarding dust settling
on cars in the area. Mr. Johnsen
stated that he researched the records and found nothing regarding a temporary
batch plant. He added that in the
1950s the property was zoned U.4.b, which permits a batch plant by right, and
the plant has been in operation for over thirty years.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. White asked
what area would be involved in the proposed PUD. Mr. Johnsen responded that it would
depend on what DEQ requires, and the drainage system. Mr. Cooper asked about any expansions
made between 1974 and 1983. Mr.
Johnsen replied that the rezoning was in 1974, and in 1977 an industrial
building was built in the IM to service the trucks in the northeast corner of
the IM. He stated that the 1979
aerial photograph shows an office building, which is a permitted use in the
OL. Mr. Cooper asked by what use
rights has the batch plant expanded into the RS district for the purposes of
storage and lagoons, and how was it authorized. Mr. Johnsen responded that he does not
suggest that it was authorized, with one exception. He was unsure that the detention pond is
a U.U. 26, and regarding the storage he did not know of any authority. Mr. White commented that all of the
requests with the exception of the screening fence of the OL portion applies
basically to the IL and IM districts, yet of the operation as it is now
currently being operated about 30% of it is in the RS area. Mr. White asked how this would work and
still keep it in the industrial district.
Mr. Johnsen asked in return if the plant can have the U.U. 26 for the
detention areas, and if the retention can be in the non-zoned parts. Mr. Dunham commented that the Board of
Adjustment decided in April that all operations cease in the RS district.
Board discussion
ensued. They agreed action on
the requests should be taken separately.
Board
Action:
On
MOTION of Dunham, the Board voted as
follows:
Seconded by
Cooper, 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Perkins, Turnbo, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Variance of building
setback from 100 to 80 within an OL district, finding that the existing
building has been there since the late 1970s;
Seconded by Perkins, 3-2-0 (White,
Dunham, Perkins, "aye"; Turnbo,
Cooper
"nay"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Variance of use conditions requiring enclosure of uses included
within Use Unit 25 and 26 if located within 300 of an R district, finding that
the IL district is not within 300 of an R district that they dont own, and the
IM district has been there for a long time, there is no benefit to enclosing
it;
Seconded by
Cooper, 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Variance of requirement
for all-weather surfacing of off-street parking areas, for a period not to
exceed 90 days, finding that it will not cause substantial detriment to the
public good or impair the purposes, spirit, and intent of the Code, or the
Comprehensive Plan;
Seconded by
Turnbo, 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Special
Exception for modification of screening requirement, applicable to the
OL and IL districts, with the conditions (A) to remove the requirement as
applied to the north boundary of the OL district, (B) to remove the requirement
as applied to the north boundary of the IL district, (C) to permit required
screening to be located west of the east line of the OL district, (D) to permit
as alternative screening, the construction of a masonry wall not less than 6
feet in height extending from the north line of the OL district to a point of
connection with the office building located within the OL district, and (E) to
permit completion of construction of required screening within 120 days, as
submitted per applicant to the Board today, finding that it will be in harmony
with the spirit and intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare;
and
Seconded by
Perkins, 4-1-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins "aye"; Cooper "nays"; no
"abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Special
Exception to permit Use Unit 26 uses within the IL district, but limited
to uses ancillary to the concrete plant operation located within the IM
district, and limited to materials and equipment storage, truck wash out, truck
rinse off and retention/detention facilities subject to the construction of a
masonry wall not less than six feet in height extending from the north line of
the OL district to a point of connection with the office building located within
the OL district, finding that it will be in harmony with the spirit and intent
of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described
property:
E/2 E/2 SE/4 SW/4 and the W/2
E/2 SE/4 SW/4 all of Section 4, T-19-N, R-14-E of the IBM, City of Tulsa, Tulsa
County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to allow Use Unit 17 (auto leasing, sales and repair) in a CS district. SECTION 701. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 17; and a Variance to allow outside storage or display of merchandise offered for sale within 300 of an R zoned district. SECTION 1217.C. USE UNIT 17. AUTOMOTIVE AND ALLIED ACTIVITIES, Use Conditions, located 6528 E. Pine.
Presentation:
The applicant,
Bill Cox, 3109 S. Lewis, came to present the requests named
above.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham asked
the applicant if he planned to build a six-foot screening fence along the south
of the parking lot. Mr. Cox
responded in the affirmative.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On
MOTION
of Dunham,
the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE
a Special Exception
to allow Use Unit 17 (auto leasing, sales and repair) in a CS district; and a
Variance to allow outside storage or display of merchandise
offered for sale within 300 of an R zoned district, finding it will not cause
substantial detriment to the public good or impair the purposes, spirit, and
intent of the Code, or the Comprehensive Plan, on the following described
property:
Lot 3, Block 2 and the E 60
of Lot 4, Block 2, St. Peter and Paul Subdivision, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County,
State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception
under Section 401 to permit the construction of the Law Clinic building as a
university use under Use Unit 5 in an RS-3 zoning district pursuant to Site and
Landscape plans approved by the Board.
SECTION 401. PRINCIPAL USES
PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 5; a Variance of the requirement
of Section 1002.A, Subsection 2 to permit three existing off-street parking
spaces and driveways along the South Florence frontage to be 0 from the
abutting street right-of-way rather than 5 as required. SECTION 1002.A. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
Frontage and Perimeter Requirements; a Variance of the requirement of Section
1002.A, Subsection 3 to permit the three existing parking spaces at the
northwest corner of the Phase 1 site to remain at 29 from the abutting
residential district on the north, rather than 5 as required. SECTION 1002.A. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS,
Frontage and Perimeter Requirements; a Variance of the requirements of Section
1302.B to permit unenclosed parking spaces within 28 of the centerline of South
Florence and within 34 of the centerline of East 4th Place rather
than 40 as required. SECTION
1302.B. SETBACKS; a Variance of the
requirements of Section 403.A to permit the Law Clinic building setback to be
39 from the centerline of East 4th Place rather than 50 as
required. SECTION 403.A. BULK AND
AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, Bulk and Area Requirements in
the RE, RS, RD, RT and RM Districts; a Special Exception under Section 401 to
permit the new parking facility within the to-be-vacated right-of-way of South
Gary north of East 4th Place and the two lots at the northeast corner
of South Gary and East 4th Place as a university use under Use Unit 5
pursuant to Site and Landscape plans approved by the Board. SECTION 401. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS; a Variance of the requirements of Section 1002.A, Subsections 1, 2
and 3, to permit the upgrade of the existing College of Law parking on the north
side of East 4th Place in accord with Site and Landscape plans
approved by the Board. SECTION
1002.A. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, Frontage and Perimeter Requirements; and a
Variance, if required, to reduce by 20 spaces the number of off-street parking
spaces within the campus as previously approved by the Board of Adjustment for
other University
buildings
and uses. SECTION 1205.C. USE UNIT
5. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND SIMILAR USES; Off-Street Parking and Loading
Requirements, located N side of E. 4th Pl. between S. Florence to the
east of S. Gary.
Presentation:
The applicant,
Charles Norman, 2900
Mid-Continent Tower, came representing University of Tulsa. He stated that these requests are to
permit the construction of a residential type law clinic across the street from
the existing law school. He
explained the reasoning for part of the request would be to preserve some large
old trees on the campus. He
reviewed the application by the planning phases.
Protestants:
Warren
Morris,
2532 E. 46th Pl., stated he is the attorney for Mr. Burke. Mr. Burkes family has owned the house
on the northeast corner of South Gary and 4th Place. Mr. Morris stated that the University of
Tulsa filed a condemnation case against Mr. Burkes property. He stated that the university is
premature in getting approval for an application that involves his clients
property.
Applicants
Rebuttal:
Mr. Norman stated that the university takes the position that they have a contract with the Tulsa Development Authority to purchase the property owned by Mr. Burke. It is their opinion that when the Tulsa Development Authority has acquired the property, then in accord with the re-use plan, the university will be obligated to redevelop the property in accordance with the Comprehensive and Urban Renewal Project Plan, approved by the Tulsa Metropolitan Planning Commission (TMAPC) and the Tulsa City Council. He stated it is their position that as the contract purchaser, they have the right to submit the proposal to the Board of Adjustment for planning approval. They understand that it cannot be executed or implemented until they actually have title to the property, from the Tulsa Development Authority.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception under Section 401 to permit the construction of
the Law Clinic building as a university use under Use Unit 5 in an RS-3 zoning
district pursuant to Site and Landscape plans approved by the Board; a
Variance of the requirement of Section 1002.A, Subsection 2 to
permit three existing off-street parking spaces and driveways along the South
Florence frontage to be 0 from the abutting street right-of-way rather than 5
as required; a Variance of the requirement of Section 1002.A,
Subsection 3 to permit the three existing parking spaces at the northwest corner
of the Phase 1 site to remain at 29 from the abutting residential district on
the north, rather than 5 as required; a Variance of the
requirements of Section 1302.B to permit unenclosed parking spaces within 28 of
the centerline of South Florence and within 34 of the centerline of East
4th Place rather than 40 as required; a Variance of
the requirements of Section 403.A to permit the Law Clinic building setback to
be 39 from the centerline of East 4th Place rather than 50 as
required; a Special Exception under Section 401 to permit the new
parking facility within the to be vacated right-of-way of South Gary north of
East 4th Place and the two lots at the northeast corner of South Gary
and East 4th Place as a university use under Use Unit 5 pursuant to
Site and Landscape plans approved by the Board; a Variance of the
requirements of Section 1002.A, Subsections 1, 2 and 3, to permit the upgrade of
the existing College of Law parking on the north side of East 4th
Place in accord with Site and Landscape plans approved by the Board; and a
Variance, if required, to reduce by 20 spaces the number of
off-street parking spaces within the campus as previously approved by the Board
of Adjustment for other University
buildings
and uses, per plan, finding that it will not cause substantial detriment to the
public good or impair the purposes, spirit, and intent of the Code, or the
Comprehensive Plan, including the preservation of the trees and provision for
additional right-of-way along South Florence Avenue, and this area is within the
area already approved by the TMAPC for this use, on the following described
property:
All of Lots 9 21, Block 1,
College Addition, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, which includes
adjacent right-of-way of South Gary to be vacated.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Variance of the
off-street parking spaces required under Section 1205.C of the Zoning Code for
the high school campus to permit the installation of the bleachers with a
seating capacity of 500 without providing the additional off-street parking
spaces required for the high school stadium. SECTION 1205.C. USE UNIT 5. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND SIMILAR USES,
Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements Use Unit 5, located W side of S.
Mingo Rd. & E. 66th St.
Presentation:
The applicant,
Charles Norman, 2900
Mid-Continent Tower, stated his request.
He pointed out that the new section of bleachers is not intended to
increase attendance but to relocate the band, pep squads, and drill team away
from the other spectators to allow all to hear the band performance.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Cooper asked how attendance would not be increased. Mr. Norman responded that the new north end zone would only be used for students. Mr. Norman explained that the old seats would be available but typically last year the attendance was very good, but only averaged 6,280 other than the Jenks game, which will not be held there this year. Mr. Cooper inquired if only Union School games would be held there. Mr. Dunham commented that they have not been selling out at the games up to now.
Interested
Parties:
Rex Woods,
9314 S. Darlington Ave., stated that the stadium is offered to 3-A and lower
class play-offs. He indicated that
attendance was as high as 2,000 to 3,000.
Mr. Norman stated that Mr. Woods is the Manager and Director of Real
Estate Administrative functions for the Union School District campus property.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Variance of the off-street parking spaces required under Section
1205.C of the Zoning Code for the high school campus to permit the installation
of the bleachers with a seating capacity of 500 without providing the additional
off-street parking spaces required for the high school stadium, which applies
only to the parking spaces required for these 500 seats, finding it will not
cause substantial detriment to the public good or impair the purposes, spirit,
and intent of the Code, or the Comprehensive Plan, on the following described
property:
NE/4 SE/4 and the N 400 of
the SE/4 SE/4, Section 1, T-18-N, R-13-E, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of
Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Variance of
required setback from centerline of North Lewis to 25 to permit a sign SECTION
1221.C.6. USE UNIT 21. BUSINESS
SIGNS AND OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, General Use Conditions for Business Signs Use
Unit 21, located 1550 N. Lewis
Ave.
Presentation:
Walter
Fininger, 3201 Manor Way, Dallas, Texas, stated he was representing
Blockbuster Video. He submitted a
site plan (Exhibit F-1), sign plan (Exhibit F-2), and photos of the shopping
center (Exhibit F-3). He stated
that this variance was
requested to
achieve more visibility of their sign for southbound traffic. The applicant stated a hardship of poor
visibility of their sign.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Turnbo, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to DENY a Variance of required setback from centerline of North
Lewis to 25 to permit a sign, finding a lack of hardship.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to allow school use in
an OL district. SECTION 601. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN OFFICE
DISTRICTS Use Unit 5, located 280 S. Memorial.
Presentation:
The applicant,
Halil Tas, 36 S. University Place #12, Stillwater, OK, stated he is
president of the Sky Foundation. He
stated the plan to open a charter school at 280 S. Memorial.
Protestants:
Evelyn
Moss,
325 S. 80th E. Ave., stated that her property adjoins the property of
the Dove School on the east. She
stated she was not opposed to the school but was concerned about the increased
traffic. Ms. Moss pointed out the
Seratoma workshop and Wal-Mart Super Center in that vicinity. She added that there is a parking lot
from the north of the subject property up to the Seratoma parking lot. She was concerned about the effect the
school might have on the OL zoning.
Marina
Rodriguez,
405 S. 80th E. Ave., stated she lives next door to Ms. Moss, and her
property abuts the parking lot in question. She stated that the property around the
church and to the north is concrete, and wondered where the school children
would have recreation.
Applicants
Rebuttal:
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception to allow school use in an OL district, per plan,
and limited to 450 students, finding that it will be in harmony with the spirit
and intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or
otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described
property:
Beg. at the SE/c of the NE/4, Section 2, T-19-N, R-13-E, thence W 357, N 384.9, E 357, S 384.9 to POB, less E 35 of the N 94 and E 50 of the S 290.9 and S 50 of the W 307 for streets AND Beg. 384.9 N of the SE/c of the NE/4 of Section 2, T-19-N, R-13-E; thence W 357, N 100, E 357, S 100 to POB, less the E 35 for street, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception
to allow church and related uses and K-12 school uses, including school sports
facilities, bus barn, and related parking.
SECTION 901. PRINCIPAL USES
PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 5, located 1003 N. 129th
E. Ave.
Presentation:
Mr. Beach stated that the BOA approved the site plan in May, 2000, but it was found that other principle uses needed approval. This application was filed for that reason.
Mike
Mowry, 1619 S. Boston, stated he represented Mr. Wozencraft.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham asked if staff has no concern per plan. Mr. Beach replied in the affirmative.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Special Exception to allow church and related uses and K-12 school uses, including school sports facilities, bus barn, and related parking, per plan, finding that it will be in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described property:
All of Trinity Park Addition,
City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Variance of the
required setback from the centerline of East 31st Street from 85 to
59 and the required rear setback from 25 to 132 for an addition to existing
dwelling. SECTION 403. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 6, located NE/c E. 31st St & S.
Trenton
Presentation:
Patrick Fox, 320
S. Boston, Ste. 1710, stated he is an architect representing his client. He informed the Board that this is an
existing residence on the northeast corner of 31st Street and
Trenton. The plan is to build a
master bedroom suite and garage to the home. The plan provides for the garage to
buffer to isolate the rear yard from the traffic noise on 31st
Street. The driveway access would
be off of Trenton. The hardship is
that the house faces west and exposes the entire rear yard to the traffic
noise. The setback would be
consistent with the existing setbacks on that street on neighboring
properties.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Turnbo, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Variance of the required setback from the centerline of East
31st Street from 85 to 59 and the required rear setback from 25 to
132 for an addition to existing dwelling, per plan, finding the hardship to be
the location of the house on the property, and finding it will not cause
substantial detriment to the public good or impair the purposes, spirit, and
intent of the Code, or the Comprehensive Plan, on the following described
property:
Lot 5 and S 5 Lot 6, Block
4, Avalon Place Addition, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of
Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to permit a mobile home in an RS-3 District. SECTION 401. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 9; a Special Exception of one year time limit to permanent. SECTION 404.E.1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, REQUIREMENTS, located 2403 N. Darlington.
Presentation:
The applicant,
Pam Wilkinson, RR 1 Box 186, Agra, OK, stated she bought the subject property
and would like to place a manufactured home there on a permanent foundation. She
submitted photographs (Exhibit J-2) of the neighborhood.
Protestants: