CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Tuesday,
September 12, 2000, 1:00 p.m.
Francis
F. Campbell City Council Room
Plaza
Level of City Hall
Tulsa
Civic Center
MEMBERS
PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT OTHERS
PRESENT
|
Dunham,
Vice Chair |
|
Beach |
Jackere,
Legal |
|
Cooper |
|
Butler |
Boulden,
Legal |
|
White,
Chair |
|
|
|
|
Perkins |
|
|
|
|
Turnbo |
|
|
|
The notice and agenda of said meeting was posted in the Office of the City Clerk on Thursday, September 7, 2000, at 2:35 p.m., as well as in the Reception Area of the INCOG offices.
After declaring a quorum present, Chair, White called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
MINUTES:
On
MOTION of Turnbo, the Board
voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays"; no
"abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE the Minutes of July 25,
2000 (No. 800) as corrected.
Action
Requested:
Variance of the required 10 side setback to 5 for construction of a single-family dwelling in an RM-2 zone. SECTION 403. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 6, located1543 S. Frisco.
Presentation:
The builder (Name
and address not stated) for Robert Bell, Jr., presented the case. He gave the reasons for this request as
follows: 16 utility easement on south border narrows the lot and a 10 setback;
a radical slope to the property from east to west prevents elongating the house
without several sets of separate steps; public good would be enhanced by a
quality residence of over 2,500 square feet; utility poles within five feet of
the house on south side, house is placed directly against a 16 utility
pole.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Turnbo,
the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE
a Variance
of the required 10 side setback to 5 for construction of a single-family
dwelling in an RM-2 zone, finding the hardship to be the 16 utility easement on
the south side of the property and the size of the lot, on the following
described property:
S 40.0 of Lot 7, Block 1,
Riverford Addition and vacated portion of East 16th Street being
29.0 adjacent to S line of Lot 7, Block 1, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State
of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Variance to allow
a detached accessory building in the required front yard. SECTION 402.B.1.b. ACCESSORY USES IN
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, Accessory Use Conditions Use Unit 6; and a Variance of
the front yard setback of 25 down to 5 for construction of a carport. SECTION 403. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, located 417 S. 75th E.
Ave.
Presentation:
Mr. and
Mrs. Wayne Webb, 417 S. 75th E. Ave., came before the
Board to present their request.
Mrs. Webb stated that they plan to have a professional install a
carport. She stated that it would
be open on the sides.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. White asked
if the side yard on the north would be the same as for the house. Mrs. White replied in the
affirmative.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham,
the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays";
no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE
a Variance
to allow a detached accessory building in the required front yard; and a
Variance of the front yard setback of 25 down to 5 for
construction of a carport, on the condition that the sides of the subject
carport remain open, finding the number of carports existing in the area, and
that it would not cause substantial detriment to the public good or impair the
purposes, spirit, and intent of the Code, or the Comprehensive Plan, on the
following described property:
Lot 4, Block 19, Tommy-Lee Addition, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to allow a single-family dwelling in an OM district. SECTION 601. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN OFFICE DISTRICTS Use Unit 6, located 1309 S. Terrace Dr.
Presentation:
Jonathon
Sutton, address not stated, attorney for Edward Winterhalder, stated that
the applicant purchased and obtained a building permit to do the required repair
and improve the property. The house
was built in 1980 and has since then been used as a single-family dwelling. It was split at one time and could have
been used as a duplex, but the applicant has prepared it as one entire unit for
a single-family dwelling. The homes
surrounding are single-family dwelling units and this property would add to the
value of those homes.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham asked
if it was to be built per the plan submitted. Mr. Sutton replied in the
affirmative.
Protestants:
Maria Barnes,
1319 S. Terrace Dr., stated that she lives next door to the subject
property. She is in favor of the
variance. She asked that the
applicant share his plans with the neighborhood, and that he be required to
repair curbs and sidewalks that have been damaged during his construction
work.
Don
Barnham,
1910 E. 13th, stated he is the president of the Terrace Drive
Neighborhood Association. He
is involved in seeking residential zoning for the whole area.
Thomas
Buckley,
1301 Terrace Dr., stated that he is for the application, and appreciates what
the applicant has done with the house.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Dunham, the Board voted
5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper "aye"; no "nays"; no
"abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a Special
Exception to allow a single-family dwelling in an OM district, per plan with the
exception that the word duplex on the plan be stricken and replace with
single-family dwelling, finding that it will be in harmony with the spirit and
intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described
property:
S 55 of Lot 7, Block 10, of
the Resubdivision of Block 6 and Lots 1-3, Block 4, Terrace Drive Addition, City
of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to permit a doublewide mobile home in an RS-3 District. SECTION 401. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 9; and a Special Exception of 1-year time limit to permanent. SECTION 404.E.1. SPECIAL EXCEPTION USES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, REQUIREMENTS, located 4238 N. Delaware Ave.
Presentation:
Granville W.
Jenkins, 11522 E. 23rd, Apt. 6, stated that he has been looking
for property for a mobile home he purchased in October last year. He stated he has contacted City of Tulsa
and will get on the City water and sewer service. He has been making improvements on the
land and it is not in a flood zone.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. White stated
he had a letter from the seller, that he is selling it to Mr. Jenkins for the
placement of a mobile home. Mr.
White added he had one letter of protest from a resident in the area about a
block to the south. Mr. Dunham
asked if this would be the applicants home or a rental property. Mr. Jenkins stated that he would be
living there. Ms. Perkins asked
about the plans for setting up the mobile.
Mr. Jenkins replied it would be on a foundation with stem walls,
tie-downs.
In the Boards
discussion of the case, Mr. White mentioned the standing letter from City
Councilor regarding objection to mobile homes in the district. It was found that
some areas where there was a concentration of mobiles would be acceptable for
new applications.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 4-1-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, "aye";
Cooper no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception to permit a double wide mobile home in an RS-3
District; and a Special Exception of 1 year time limit to
permanent, per plan on the condition that it be skirted and on a
permanent foundation, noting that it is a modular home, finding that it will be
in harmony with the spirit and intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to
the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, on the
following described property:
Beg. 30 W of the SE/c of the N/2 NE/4 SE/4 NW/4; thence W 144.24, N 128; thence Ely 114.24 S 123.3 to the POB, in Section 17, T-20-N R-13-E, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Approval of a modification to a previously approved site plan to add a nurses station on the south side, located S of SE/c E. Admiral Pl. & S. Garnett.
Presentation:
Calvin
Nichols,
2121 S. Columbia, stated that the existing hospital is a non-conforming use due
to a zoning change. He added that
one of the requirements was that any additions would require Board of Adjustment
(BOA) approval. The proposal is for
a small 343 square foot nursing station addition to the south wing. It has been designed by an architect,
approved by the governing Board for state hospitals, and meets all the
requirements of the City of Tulsa Building Codes.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
modification to a previously approved site plan to add a nurses station on the
south side, per plan submitted, on the condition that no further expansion can
be done without BOA approval, on the following described
property:
A tract of land that is part
of Lot 1, Block 1, Western Village Heights, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State
of Oklahoma and part of Government Lot 5, and part of the SW/4 of the NW/4 of
Section 5, T-19-N, R-14-E, said tract of land being more particularly described
as follows, to-wit: Beg. at the NW/c of said Lot1; thence due N parallel with
and 50 Ely of the Wly line of said Section 5 for 370.00; thence S 89Ί530 E
parallel with the Nly line of said Lot 1 of Western Village Heights for 680;
thence due S parallel with the Wly line of said Section 5 for 375.00 to the
NE/c of said Lot 1; thence S 9Ί3438 W along the Ely line of Lot 1 for 226.74;
thence N 89Ί530 W parallel to the Nly line of Lot 1 for 360.25; thence due S
parallel with the Wly line of Lot 1 for 147.84; thence N 89Ί530 W parallel to
the Nly line of Lot 1 for 282.03 to a point on the Wly line of Lot 1; thence
due N along said Wly line for 371.50 to the POB of said tract of
land.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to allow a mini-storage in a CS district. SECTION 701. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 16; and a Variance of 75 setback from an R district down to 0 for a mini-storage. SECTION 903. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, located N side of Virgin, E of Sheridan.
Presentation:
Mr.
Beach,
reminded the Board that one of the conditions for mini-storage use is that it be
located with frontage on and access to an arterial street, and this site does
not have that. He stated that if it
were approved today the applicant would need to come back in the future for a
variance of that requirement
Tom
Christopoulos, 12113 S. Memorial Dr., Bixby, stated the request to place a
mini-storage on this site. He
informed the BOA that they had opened several other mini-storage businesses in
the area, and this one would be similar in design. He provided some photos (Exhibit D-2,
D-3). They plan to meet all
of the landscape requirements of the City of Tulsa. He described the surrounding properties
are: 75 of residential that is still farmland, and all around it is industrial
and on the back is a highway that abuts the airport.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception to allow a mini-storage in a CS district, per
plan, subject to the landscape requirements, and all other requirements of the
Code; and a Variance of 75 setback from an R district down to 0
for a mini-storage, finding the hardship to be that the property is zoned RS-3,
but is undeveloped and probably wont be developed for residential; an to
CONTINUE the balance of this application to the meeting of October
10, 2000 for the additional relief, on the following described
property:
A part of the W/2 NW/4 of Section 26, T-20-N, R-13-E, IBM, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, being more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at the SW/c of said W/2 NW/4 of Section 26; thence N 01Ί1808 W along the W line of said Section 26, for a distance of 40.00; thence N 88Ί4525 E parallel to and 40.00 N of the S line of said W/2 of the NW/4 for a distance of 200.00 to the POB, being a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence N 01Ί1808 W parallel to the W line of said Section 26, a distance of 650.00 to a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence N 88Ί4525 E parallel to the S line of said W/2 NW/4, a distance of 209.06 to a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence S 10Ί2318 W, a distance of 510.58 to a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence S 88Ί0832 E, a distance of 27.98 to a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence S 01Ί1808 E parallel to the W line of said Section 26, a distance of 148.39 to a 3/8 iron pin with cap; thence S 88Ί4525 W parallel to and 40.00 N of the S line of said W/2 NW/4, a distance of 133.54 to the POB.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Variance of the required setback from centerline of South Memorial from 110 to 82 for the expansion of a non-conforming structure. SECTION 903. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 17; and a Variance to allow expansion of non-conforming structure. SECTION 1405. STRUCTURAL NONCONFORMITIES, located 3708 S. Memorial.
Presentation:
Wayne
Alberty, 201 W. 5th St., Ste. 570, stated he is that he was
representing C & C Harley Davidson, and the owner Larry Wolford. He stated that he and others in his firm
are the architects and planners of this project. They originally planned to build within
the 50 setback, however after presentation of the plan, the owners felt they
needed additional square footage.
The area where relief is needed would be the UPS delivery area to line up
the canopy to line up with the face of the existing building.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Variance of the required setback from centerline of South Memorial
from 110 to 82 for the expansion of a non-conforming structure, per plan; and
a Variance to allow expansion of non-conforming structure, finding
the structure is existing and addition will be in line with the existing
structure, and that this improvement will not cause substantial detriment to the
public good or impair the purposes, spirit, and intent of the Code, or the
Comprehensive Plan, on the following described property:
Part of Lot 1, Block 1,
Dotson Center, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, being more
particularly described as follows, to-wit: Beg. at the SE/c of said Lot 1, Block
1, said point also being the NE/c of Lot 2, Block 1, Dotson Center, thence N
0Ί0300 E and along the E line of said Lot 1, Block 1, for 154.67; thence due
W for 240.00; thence S 0Ί0300 W and parallel to the E line of said Lot 1,
Block 1 for 261.11 to a point on the S line of said Lot 1, Block 1 for 45.42;
thence S 64Ί4007 E and along the S line of said Lot 1, Block 1 for 45.42;
thence N 37Ί4129 E and continuing along the S line of said Lot 1, Block 1, for
235.00 to the POB.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception
to permit a transitional living center.
SECTION 901. PRINCIPAL USES
PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 2/9; a Special Exception to permit
a manufactured home in an IL zoned district. SECTION 901. PRINCIPAL USES PERMITTED IN INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICTS; located 5624 S. 107th E. Ave.5624 S. 107th E.
Ave.
Presentation:
Scott
McGinness, Assistant Director of the HOW Foundation Drug and Alcohol
Rehabilitation Center, 5649 S. Garnett, stated he understood that they do not
need the Special Exception to permit a transitional living center due to a
recent change in the zoning code.
He stated that the second request is for the manufactured home on the
subject property to use as a transitional living center. It would be occupied by up to nine men,
which would include a live-in staff supervisor. Mr. McGinness added that the facility
would be for men that have successfully completed the long-term drug and alcohol
rehabilitation center, but want to continue to live in a drug and alcohol free
environment and start transitioning themselves back into
society.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. White asked
if the home would still be placed at the back of the property as shown in the
plan. Mr. McGinness responded that
it would, and the only change would be that the home they have found is 56 long
rather than the 48 they had proposed. He stated that they would place it
on an existing concrete slab. Mr.
Dunham asked if the warehouse would remain on the property. Mr. McGinness stated that it would, but
it was not cost effective to convert to a living center.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Cooper, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception to permit a manufactured home in
an IL zoned district, finding that it will be in harmony with the spirit and
intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described
property:
Lot 1, Block 2, Golden Valley
Addition, less beg. at the SW/c said Lot 1, thence N 01Ί2202 W for 161.46;
thence N 88Ί4221 E for 352.35; thence S 05Ί1501 W for 162.53; thence
S88Ί4230 W for 333.62 to POB and Lot 2, Block 2, Golden Valley Addition, less
beg. at the SW/c said Lot 2, thence N 01Ί2202 W for 161.46; thence N
88Ί4230 E for 333.62; thence S 05Ί1501 W for 162.53; thence S 88Ί4236 W
for 314.89 to POB, all being in the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of
Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Action
Requested:
Special Exception
to allow a 6 high decorative wall/fence within the required front yard. SECTION 210.B.3. YARDS, Permitted
Obstructions in Required Yards Use Unit 6, located 2516 E. 28th
St.
Presentation:
John
Walton, architect for the project, (no address stated) presented for Ralph
Klumpp. He stated that the owner
would like to have the option on the side property lines to make the fence more
than four feet inside the 35 setback.
Mr. Beach responded that it is within the front yard and approval of the
application would allow that height.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Special Exception to allow a 6 high decorative wall/fence within
the required front yard, per plan submitted, on the condition that along the
front property line the fence would be four feet except as it approaches the
gates could increase to six feet on the following described
property:
Lot 1, Block 2, South Lewis
Park Addition and the W 60 of the N/2 of Lot 2, Block 3, Woody Crest Addition,
more particularly described as follows, to-wit: Beg. at the NW/c of said lot
thence S along the W line of said lot a distance of 260.26 to a point, said
point being the SE/c of Lot 1, and the NE/c of Lot 5, Block 2, South Lewis Park
Addition; thence S 88Ί41 E a distance of 60 to a point; thence N a distance of
252.20 to a point on the N line of said lot; thence N 80Ί 33 W a distance of
61 to the POB, save and separate that portion of the N/2 of said lot previously
deeded to the city for street purposes, all in the City of Tulsa, Tulsa County,
State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Case
No. 18851
Action
Requested:
Variance of front yard from 25 to 20 to permit an addition. SECTION 403. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 6, located 4644 S. Vandalia.
Presentation:
Richard
Amatucci, 4644 S. Vandalia Ave., stated he and his wife are the owners of
the subject property. He stated
that they are requesting the variance because of the irregular shape of the
lot. He informed the Board they
want to build a 700 square foot
addition to the south and the east of the existing structure. He submitted a site plan, and a first
floor plan (Exhibits M-1, M-2).
Comments and
Questions:
Ms. Turnbo asked
if it was just the corner of the proposed structure near Vandalia Avenue that is
in question. He replied in the
affirmative.
Protestants:
A neighbor (Name
and address not given) stated her desire to see the plans. Ms. Turnbo suggested they continue the
case later in the hearing to give them time to go over the plans for the
neighbors review outside the room.
Board
Action:
Mr. White stated
that case would be heard later, so the hearing could
continue.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Case
No. 18852
Action
Requested:
Variance to allow outdoor display and open-air storage of merchandise within 300 of an R zoned district on the north. SECTION 1214.C. USE UNIT 14. SHOPPING GOODS AND SERVICES, Use Conditions Use Unit 14, located 11212 E. Admiral Pl.
Presentation:
Judy
Mitts, 11212 E. Admiral Pl., stated that she has worked for Leggett Supply
for 21 years. She stated that they
have had outdoor storage of fiberglass steps, porches, water pipes and similar
items for manufactured homes.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham asked
if the outdoor-storage area is to the east of the building where it was enclosed
by a fence. She responded that was
correct. He asked if storage would
be there for 24 hours a day everyday.
She responded that he was correct.
Mr. White asked if there was anything stored outside of the fence. She stated that right now they have some
porches on display in the front of the building. Mr. White asked if this application was
generated in response to a Neighborhood Inspectors complaint. She replied in the affirmative. Mr. Dunham stated that the Board
would need to be clear about what the applicant wants in the way of outside
storage. Ms. Mitts stated that she
would need the outside storage and could keep everything to the east of the
building within the fence. She
stated that they would need to store fiberglass porches, wooden steps, water and
sewer pipe, and blocking wood on a 24 hour per day basis.
Mr. Dunham
questioned how close the subject property is to residentially zoned
property. Mr. Beach did not have
adequate dimensions to answer. Mr.
White stated that for the record, there are ten different complaints listed by
Neighborhood Inspections (Exhibit G-1).
Protestants:
Nancy
Craten, 245 S. 120th E. Ave., stated that she was representing
several different people today. She
read the letter (Exhibit G-2) of the official stand of the East Tulsa Mingo
Valley Association regarding this application, requesting the BOA not to approve
this application. The letter stated
that the property has been an eyesore for years. It further stated that while other such
businesses have operated with a decent premises and yet this one does not. The letter also included that in 1998
this neighborhood association presented a certificate to the Oak Creek Village
Mobile Home Dealership directly across the street east from this applicants
premises. The certificate was for
being a good neighbor to neighborhoods in the area. She also presented a letter
from Branden Hazel, the general manager of Oak Creek Village, which stated that
the aesthetic condition of the grounds belonging to Leggett Supply was very
poor, appearing very unorganized and rundown. The letter suggests the need for a
higher and less revealing screening fence.
It was the managers concern that the poor appearance not only affects
Leggetts Supply business but also at Oak Creek Village. Dr. Gainer, of Brookhaven was present
but had to leave and gave Ms. Craten a written note that Brookhaven opposes the
application due to the physical appearance of the property and the potential of
the intended use to deteriorate the neighborhood. Ms. Craten also presented two letters
from neighbors in the area with the same concerns.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Dunham asked if an adequate screening fence would satisfy the neighborhood. She replied if it was high, attractive, and actually screened the view of the outside storage. Mr. White determined that an 8 fence would work best.
Protestants:
The following protestants came before the Board with the same complaints listed above:
Wayne Bohanon, 10617
E. 1st St., member of the Wagon Wheel Homeowners
Association
Dominic
White,
17717 E. Admiral Pl., owner of Fluid Specialties
Rebuttal:
Ms. Mitts stated
that she just recently became the general manager and her plans are to clean the
business up and keep it that way.
Comments and
Questions:
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Turnbo, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to DENY the
Variance to allow outdoor display and open-air storage of
merchandise within 300 of an R zoned district on the north, finding a lack of
hardship.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
Case
No. 18853
Action
Requested:
Variance of required side yard on a non-arterial street from 15 to 6.6. SECTION 403. BULK AND AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Use Unit 6, located 2902 S. Boston Ct.
Presentation:
Sonya
Langley, 2902 S. Boston Ct., stated that she owns the subject property. She is doing an extensive remodeling
project, using B & B Custom Home and Remodeling. She stated that her plans were to add an
attached garage
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. White stated
that the staff comments questioned if the old driveway was to be removed. She stated that she had not planned to
remove the small portion of old driveway to the street because the original
garage was converted and there was no garage there.
Protestants:
None.
Board
Action:
On MOTION
of Dunham, the Board voted 5-0-0 (White, Dunham, Turnbo, Perkins, Cooper
"aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; no "absences") to APPROVE a
Variance of required side yard on a non-arterial street from 15
to 6.6, per plan submitted, finding the hardship to be the configuration of the
lot, on the following described property:
Lot 1 and the N 15 of Lot 2,
Block 2, Travis Park Addition, City of Tulsa, Tulsa County, State of
Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.