MINUTES of Meeting No. 269
|
Alberty,
Chair |
Dillard,
Vice Chair |
Butler |
West,
|
|
Tyndall |
|
Beach |
Blakely,
D.A. |
|
Walker |
|
|
|
|
Hutson |
|
|
|
The notice
and agenda of said meeting were posted in the Office of INCOG,
After
declaring a quorum present, Chair Alberty called the meeting to order at 1:30
p.m.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.
UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
Action
Requested:
Special Exception for a sand extraction plant in an AG district, located
North and West of the Northwest Corner of East 141st Street and
Presentation:
Mr. Beach informed the Board that the applicant had withdrawn the
application.
Interested
Parties:
There were
no interested parties who wished to speak.
Board
Action:
No Board Action required.
The portion of Lots 6 and 7 lying N of the Midland Valley Railroad
right-of-way, less that part of Lot 7 lying W of Posey Creek; and in that
portion of the SE/4 SE/4 lying N of said Midland
Valley Railroad right-of-way, all in Section 10, T-17-N, R-13-E, of the IBM.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
MINUTES
On MOTION of
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
NEW
APPLICATIONS
Action
Requested:
Variance of the required 30 frontage on a public road
to 0. SECTION 207.
STREET FRONTAGE REQUIRED Use Unit 6, located 3909 S. 252nd
W. Ave.
Presentation:
Gary Nichols, 3909 S.
252nd W. Ave., stated he has lived on the property for 23 years. He added he has had two mobile homes on
it in the past, and now he would like to move in a doublewide mobile home. He was told he would need 30 of
road frontage. He informed the
Board that his property is behind another piece of property.
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Alberty asked Mr. Nichols for a hardship. Mr. Nichols indicated he was not aware
he needed to provide a hardship and he has already purchased the home he wants
to replace the existing home. He
never had a problem with the two he had there previously. Mr. Hutson noted that it was surveyed in
1983 by the previous owner. He
questioned if the easement was filed.
Interested
Parties:
There were
no interested parties who wished to speak.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Tyndall, the Board voted 4-0-0
(Alberty, Walker, Hutson, Tyndall aye; no nays; no abstentions; Dillard
absent) to APPROVE a Variance of the required 30
frontage on a public road to 0, with condition that the new home is replacing
the existing home, finding no increase of density or significant changes in the
use of the property, on the following described property:
Part SE SW Beg. 416.22 N SW/c SE SW thence N 536.90 E 235.00 S 534.94
W 235.00 POB, Section 20, T-19-N, R-10-E, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Action
Requested:
Variance to allow two dwelling units on one lot of
record. SECTION 208. ONE
SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING PER LOT OF RECORD; and a Special Exception to allow a
single-wide manufactured home in an AG-R zoned district. SECTION
310. PRINCIPAL USES
PERMITTED IN THE AGRICULTURE DISTRICT Use Unit 9 and 6, located 12703 N.
93rd St.
Presentation:
A. F. Buttler,
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Alberty noted a site plan was not submitted. He asked about the other structures on
the property. Mr. Buttler responded that they are out buildings.
Interested
Parties:
There were
no interested parties who wished to speak.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Walker, the Board voted 4-0-0 (Alberty,
Walker, Tyndall, Hutson "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; Dillard "absent" to
APPROVE a Variance to allow two dwelling units
on one lot of record, finding there is sufficient land space for two dwelling
units; and a Special Exception to allow a
single-wide manufactured home in an AG-R zoned district, for as long as the
daughter needs the second dwelling, on the following described property:
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Action
Requested:
Special Exception under Section 310 of the County Zoning Code to permit
the KMUS-AM antenna system to be constructed within an AG district. SECTION
310. PRINCIPAL USES
PERMITTED IN THE AGRICULTURE DISTRICT Use Unit 4; and a Special Exception of
the requirements of Section 1204.3.C.2.(b) to permit the southwest antenna of
the KMUS-AM antenna system to be located within 285 feet of the north boundary
of the RMH district boundary line to the south. SECTION 1204.3.C.s.(b) USE UNIT 4.
PUBLIC PROTECTION AND UTILITY FACILITIES, Use Conditions, located 430 N
of NE/c E. 76th
Presentation:
Charles E. Norman, 2900
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Alberty noted 300 distance from the
RMH district on the site plan but the special exception requests 285. Mr. Norman replied that is to provide
for a 15 latitude for any technical problems that
arise in setting up the antenna closest to the boundary line to the south.
Interested
Parties:
There were
no interested parties who wished to speak.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Walker, the Board voted 4-0-0 (Alberty,
Walker, Tyndall, Hutson "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; Dillard "absent") to
APPROVE a Special
Exception under
Section 310 of the County Zoning Code to permit the KMUS-AM antenna system to be
constructed within an AG district; and a Special Exception of the
requirements of Section 1204.3.C.2.(b) to permit the southwest antenna of the
KMUS-AM antenna system to be located within 285 feet of the north boundary of
the RMH district boundary line to the south, finding it will be in harmony with
the spirit and intent of the Code, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood
or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare, on the following described
property:
Lot 4, Section 30, T-21-N, R-13-E,
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Action
Requested:
Use Variance to permit a warehouse in an AG district, located 15025 S.
Lewis.
Presentation:
Mr. Beach informed the Board the application was sent to Glenpool and
Bixby for a referral. The City of
Mike Sitton, 10427
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Beach informed the Board that the applicant is not advertised for
mini-storage use and he would need to re-advertise for the different use unit.
Interested
Parties:
Doug Pittman, 14736 S.
Lewis, stated he owns the property across Lewis from the subject property. He stated opposition to the
application. He pointed out the
development for a two mile strip on 151st from
James Parker,
Gladys Marlene Parker,
Rosie Hoskins, 2290 E.
151st
Jim Glover, 1724 E.
151st, stated he lives about one half mile west of the subject
property. He stressed to the
Board that estate homes and agriculture are existing in the area and with the
flat topography the warehouse would be clearly seen. He also mentioned there is plenty of
land already zoned and available for this type of business.
George Carley, 14801 S. Lewis, stated he owns the property to
the north of the subject property.
He stated his concern for the storm water management with any new
construction. He informed the Board
that the existing industrial building appears to be a home on the outside so it
does not look like an industrial business.
Frank Selmeyer,
Bruce Ewing,
Louise Gordon, 2310 E.
151st, mailed a letter of opposition (Exhibit B-3) to the
Board.
Applicants
Rebuttal:
Mr. Sitton did not choose to make a
rebuttal.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Hutson, the Board voted 4-0-0 (Alberty,
Walker, Tyndall, Hutson "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; Dillard "absent") to
DENY a Use Variance to permit a warehouse in an
AG district, finding a lack of hardship and that re-zoning would better serve
the purpose, on the following described property:
The S 667.59 W/2 W/2 SW/4 SW/4 of Section 17, T-17-N R-13-E of the IBM,
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Action
Requested:
Variance of maximum 750 square feet to 1448 square feet
to permit an additional storage building in an RS district on a 2.5 acre
tract. SECTION 240.2. YARDS, Permitted Yard Obstructions Use Unit
6, located
Presentation:
Hugh Bright,
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Hutson asked why he wanted to build so close to the fence line. Mr. Bright explained there was an old
well in the way. He added that he
could move it north but it would be farther from the house. Mr. Bright pointed out that it would
hinder the development of the back part of the property if they decide to do
that in the future. Mr. Bright also
discussed his plans with his neighbor and the neighbor was not opposed. He assured the Board that he would not
be using it for commercial purposes.
Interested
Parties:
There were
no interested parties who wished to speak.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Walker, the Board voted 4-0-0 (Alberty,
Walker, Tyndall, Hutson "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; Dillard "absent") to
APPROVE a Variance of maximum
750 square feet to 1448 square feet to permit an additional storage building in
an RS district on a 2.5 acre tract, with condition the building not be used for
commercial use, and finding the size of the lot for agricultural use would
require more storage than a city lot, and would be an improvement, on the
following described property:
A part of the E/2 SW/4 SW/4 of Section 4,
T-17-N, R-14-E of the IBM,
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
Action
Requested:
Special Exception to permit selected Use Unit 5 and Use Unit 20 uses in
an AG zoned district (uses limited to an amphitheater, planetarium and botanical
garden). SECTION
1205. USE UNIT 5. COMMUNITY SERVICES AND
SIMILAR USES and SECTION 1220.
USE UNIT 20. COMMERCIAL
RECREATION: INTENSIVE Use Unit 5
and 20; a Variance to permit a portion of the off-street parking on a
non-all-weather material. SECTION 1340.
DESIGN STANDARDS FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AREAS; a
Variance of the required screening fence when abutting an R zoned district,
located SE of
Presentation:
Mr. Alberty stated the application was sent to Sand Springs on a referral
basis. The Sand Springs Board of
Adjustment recommended approval of the concept subject to final approval of a
detailed plan.
Ricky Jones,
Comments and
Questions:
Mr. Alberty asked if the developer has done other projects like
this. Mr. Jones replied that they
probably have not done a project of this magnitude before. They have hired
Mr. Beach commented to the Board that the screening requirement could be
waived by Special Exception if they so chose.
Interested
Parties:
Dale Hallford, 7200 W.
Brady, stated about 1700 of his
property abuts the east side of the subject property. He expressed concern that he would have
people coming onto his property from the project and lose his privacy. He also stated concern for liability if
the public were harmed by his livestock.
He opposed allowing the natural buffers to be the only screening. He stated that because of the sandy
soil, all parking should be on an all-weather-surface. He pointed out this would displace the
wildlife.
Gayla Hallford,
7200 W. Brady, informed the Board that they purchased this property about one
year ago, as their permanent residence after a forced buyout for the Gilcrease Expressway.
She expressed concern for the wildlife and noise
pollution.
Reba Helker,
Applicants
Rebuttal:
Mr. Jones had no response to the wildlife displacement. He stated that according to noise
experts, the bass tones follow the terrain and higher pitches go up. They are definitely concerned about this
subject and are planning the position of the amphitheater accordingly. They are willing to construct a
screening fence if neighboring property owners prefer.
Board
Action:
On MOTION of Hutson, the Board voted 4-0-0 (Alberty,
Walker, Tyndall, Hutson "aye"; no "nays"; no "abstentions"; Dillard "absent") to
APPROVE a Special
Exception to permit
selected Use Unit 5 and Use Unit 20 uses in an AG zoned district (uses limited
to an amphitheater, planetarium and botanical garden) per conceptual plans, with
condition for detail site plans for any further approval; and to DENY a Variance to permit a
portion of the off-street parking on a non-all-weather material; and a Variance of the required screening
fence when abutting an R zoned district, but variances may be requested again
with detail site plans, on the following described property:
Five tracts of land that are part of Section 6, T-19-N, R-12-E of the
IBM, Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, said tracts being generally described as
follows: Tract 1: The N 935.00 E
931.76 SW/4 of said Section 6; Tract 2: The S 935.00 N 1870.00 E 931.76 SW/4
of Section 6, less beg. at the SW/c of said Tract; thence Nly 403.00; thence
Ely 345.00; thence Sly 53.00; thence Ely 165.00; thence Sly 20.00; thence
Ely 175.00; thence Sly 122.00; thence Ely 246.00; thence Sly 208.00; thence
Wly 931.76 to the POB of Tract 2; Tract 3: The W 984.24 E 1916.00 SW/4 of
Section 6, less the S 770.00 E 368.00 and less the W 210.00 E 1510.00 S
520.65 of Section 6; Tract 4: All that part of Gvt.
Lot 3 of said Section 6, lying S of Old North Sand Springs Rd.; and all that
part of Gvt. Lot 5 of Section 6, and the SE/4 of the
NW/4 of Section 6, lying S of said S of said road and Ely of a line, said line
beg. 1153.00 Ely SW/c of said
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at
Date approved: ___________________________________
___________________________________
Chair